<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 11 Best Ultra Compact Digital Cameras</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalpicturezone.com/digital-cameras/the-11-best-ultra-compact-digital-cameras/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalpicturezone.com/digital-cameras/the-11-best-ultra-compact-digital-cameras/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cory</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpicturezone.com/digital-cameras/the-11-best-ultra-compact-digital-cameras/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 02:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpicturezone.com/digital-cameras/the-11-best-ultra-compact-digital-cameras/#comment-184</guid>
		<description>I've read that 6 megapixels is optimum for this size camera. It has to do with the size of the sensor combined with the form factor. I get the picture that digital cameras are becoming like bicicles in their marketing. If you go out to but a bike, the domestic mentality is that the more speeds the better, when in reality less speeds and more robustness would suit the average person much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read that 6 megapixels is optimum for this size camera. It has to do with the size of the sensor combined with the form factor. I get the picture that digital cameras are becoming like bicicles in their marketing. If you go out to but a bike, the domestic mentality is that the more speeds the better, when in reality less speeds and more robustness would suit the average person much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mac</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpicturezone.com/digital-cameras/the-11-best-ultra-compact-digital-cameras/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpicturezone.com/digital-cameras/the-11-best-ultra-compact-digital-cameras/#comment-156</guid>
		<description>You can find these cameras with very good comparison tool at http://www.reviewgist.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can find these cameras with very good comparison tool at <a href="http://www.reviewgist.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.reviewgist.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpicturezone.com/digital-cameras/the-11-best-ultra-compact-digital-cameras/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpicturezone.com/digital-cameras/the-11-best-ultra-compact-digital-cameras/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Wow I am looking for a new camera and that's a good list, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow I am looking for a new camera and that&#8217;s a good list, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Dragon</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpicturezone.com/digital-cameras/the-11-best-ultra-compact-digital-cameras/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Dragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpicturezone.com/digital-cameras/the-11-best-ultra-compact-digital-cameras/#comment-149</guid>
		<description>You missed the best of the best Ultra Compact!
The Casio Exilim line are outstanding and have had higher pixel densities than the cameras mentioned for more than two years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You missed the best of the best Ultra Compact!<br />
The Casio Exilim line are outstanding and have had higher pixel densities than the cameras mentioned for more than two years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
